Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:56:19 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Subject: Re: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc Message-ID: <CAGH67wRPKrdmzBqWop6SBpUOOOMNjLEwg22J9GvVC6q-1qm%2BUw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120103231956.GA25173@icarus.home.lan> References: <201201030015.q030FwC1070840@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca> <CA%2BWntOvfogO7Z8tL_9x6rnd66xyDQTc2tkYqxFHG2G4A9H-j7A@mail.gmail.com> <20120103231956.GA25173@icarus.home.lan>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
(mav@, powerpc@, stable@, SuperBisquit BCCed)
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
<freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:31:15PM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote:
>> I still say that the system should be built natively on powerpc equipment.
>
> What relevancy does that have to the situation? We're seeing the same
> for other architectures, not just powerpc.
>
> 4516 01/02 21:53 FreeBSD Tinderbox (3.9K) [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386
> 4517 01/02 22:07 FreeBSD Tinderbox (3.9K) [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64
> 4518 01/02 22:46 FreeBSD Tinderbox (3.9K) [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98
> 4519 01/03 00:11 FreeBSD Tinderbox (3.9K) [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
> 4520 01/03 00:15 FreeBSD Tinderbox (3.9K) [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc
> 4522 01/03 00:57 FreeBSD Tinderbox (3.9K) [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc
>
> This is obviously a "botched" commit by mav@ that breaks RELENG_9 but
> not RELENG_8.
>
> In CVS I see no further commits to fix this, so I'm CC'ing mav@ here.
This is yet another transient out-of-sync tinderbox issue that
I've seen for the past year on current@ (and I'm sure has been
happening longer). I've raised the concern to cluster@, des@, and
tinderbox@.
Thanks,
-Garrett
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wRPKrdmzBqWop6SBpUOOOMNjLEwg22J9GvVC6q-1qm%2BUw>