Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 07 Jun 1996 02:19:05 -0700
From:      Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@sri.mt.net>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Status of -stable 
Message-ID:  <199606070919.CAA21218@kachina.jetcafe.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> writes:
>[ If you're having *lots* of fun you forget about testing and quickly
>commit your changes and then go watch the NBA finals or something like
>that, knowing that some geek w/out a life will immediately upgrade his
>sources and blow away his system testing out your code. *grin* ]

Given all your well worded statements of understanding about people
who need stable systems (different than the -stable release), THIS
is why I don't use -current. ;-)

I'd really love to have fun with you guys. Really. Hell if I had
my way, I'd be digging deep into the code. 

My clients, however, don't like to have fun in the same way. And while
I am not an advocate of any sort of subscription to the notions of
credibility, the fledgling commercial internet businesses don't have
any other way to separate hype from competance. 

>Basically, if I bring in a fix to a user-land utility/library, it should
>go into -current to be beat on for 'a while to make sure the fix is
>valid unless it's really an obvious fix.  Then, I should bring the fix
>into -stable once 'a while' has passed and the fix has been properly
>tested.  The rub is that 'a while' is variable, and that once the fix is
>in the developer moves onto bigger/better things and forgets completely
>about the fix using the now-famous quote "It's been fixed in
>-current".

Isn't that what the SNAPs are really for? Correct me if I'm wrong (and
who out there won't?) but aren't these supposed to be "more stable
snapshots" of -current?

On a related note, software I deliver to customers is (usually)
accompanied by Q&A procedures. Is there *any* way to Q&A an entire
UNIX system in an automated fashion? One solution to the "-stable"
thing is to have a "test script" (oh right, one script?) that
exercises all known bugs...
------
Dave Hayes - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org 
Freedom Knight of Usenet - http://www.jetcafe.org/~dave/usenet

    In a meadow, the King shot an arrow at a deer but missed.  "Bravo!" a
    Fool shouted. The King became angry and snapped "So! You're making fun
         of me, eh? I am going to punish the life out of you!"
     "My word of praise was not for His Excellency, but for the deer."



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606070919.CAA21218>