Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:40:15 +0000 From: "tony sarendal" <dualcyclone@gmail.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vr0: rx packet lost Message-ID: <ad7542dc0603080040p35956b28r@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <440CB05E.6000805@netfence.it> References: <440C961A.1060107@netfence.it> <20060306211542.U87940@unsane.co.uk> <440CB05E.6000805@netfence.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/03/06, Andrea Venturoli <ml.diespammer@netfence.it> wrote: > > Vince Hoffman wrote: > > > > This may sound silly but if performance is that bad have you checked if > > you have a Duplex mismatch ? (one side set to full manually and the > > other to auto commonly results in duplex mismatches in my experience. > > (see http://www.cites.uiuc.edu/network/autosense.html or use google for > > more info) > > Hm, my switch isn't manageable, so it can't be set manually to > full-duplex and must be using autosense. > As for the card: > > > ifconfig vr0 > > vr0: flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > inet 10.1.2.125 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 10.255.255.255 > > inet6 fe80::213:d4ff:fecc:a6a2%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > > ether 00:13:d4:cc:a6:a2 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) > > status: active > > This was configured through rc.conf with: > > > ifconfig_vr0=3D"DHCP" > > > So I guess this is not the problem. There are cases where equipment don't get along and autoneg doesn't work. Try setting your end to 10M/half duplex and see if you still have the problem. /Tony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ad7542dc0603080040p35956b28r>