Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:41:16 +0200 From: Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Cc: Jeff <jeff@doeshosting.com> Subject: Re: PVR-150 improvements Message-ID: <200809040741.16496.shoesoft@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <EBB51CDA-63C3-4562-A5D6-2B879B72A5C5@doeshosting.com> References: <20080903120019.EF0CB10656AB@hub.freebsd.org> <67921C73D4E24B8E9B51A1E79CDF7F2D@leaf101> <EBB51CDA-63C3-4562-A5D6-2B879B72A5C5@doeshosting.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 04 September 2008 06:20:52 Jeff wrote: > On Sep 3, 2008, at 4:24 PM, Martin Ziegler wrote: > >> Here are my patches against pvrxxx-09042008 from > >> http://usleepless.110mb.com/pvrxxx_port.tgz > >> In the current state the patches will break other cards > >> because I haven't > >> included checks which card is attached. But I hope they will > >> make it in some > >> way into the next pvrxxx version. ... > Stefan, > thank you for adressing these problems, I can't wait to test with my > 250. > I will report back after testing it if nobody else has. If you don't have a PVR-150 with a remote you have to exclude these files from the patch: dev/cxm/cxm.c dev/cxm/cxm.h and dev/cxm/cxm_ir.c Currently, these fix the remote on my card but will break others. The patches to the other files _should_ work for all cards (or at least do no harm). -- Stefan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200809040741.16496.shoesoft>