Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 15:31:53 -0500 (EST) From: matt <matt@BabCom.ORG> To: Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BIND NXT Bug Vulnerability Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.20.9911111530060.848-100000@s01.arpa-canada.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.991111101516.20225E-100000@java.dpcsys.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Dan Busarow wrote:
[...]
: Relying on ports for crital bits such as bind and sendmail seems, uh,
: risky?
Considering that the version of bind included in -STABLE (supped 10-14-99)
is 8.1.2, so I hate to rely on ports, but this does seem to be the
quickest method for keeping up on new versions. There is virtually no
difference in compiling bind from the ports or from raw source, the former
is simply an easier way, and keeps things in order with little hassle.
: Dan
: --
: Dan Busarow 949 443 4172
: Dana Point Communications, Inc. dan@dpcsys.com
: Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82
Matt
--
"If the primates that we came from had known that someday politicians
would come out of the...the gene pool, they'd a stayed up in the trees
and written evolution off as a bad idea. Hell, I always thought the
opposable thumb was overrated."
-Sheridan, "A Distant Star"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.20.9911111530060.848-100000>