Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:42:21 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release Makefile Message-ID: <20040116.114221.123967641.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20040116161541.GA8293@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040115111124W.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20040115083715.GA79312@FreeBSD.org.ua> <20040116161541.GA8293@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20040116161541.GA8293@dragon.nuxi.com>
"David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:37:15AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
: > You didn't get it. It's possible to have a RELENG_4 box (with
: > RELENG_4 /usr/src and /usr/obj matching the running version),
: > and build a release snapshot of HEAD.
:
: This is WAY not officially supported!
:
: - echo "/etc/rc.d/ldconfig start" >> ${_MK}
: + echo "if [ -f /etc/rc.d/ldconfig ]; then" >> ${_MK}
: + echo " /etc/rc.d/ldconfig start" >> ${_MK}
: + echo "else" >> ${_MK}
: + echo " ldconfig /lib /usr/lib /usr/local/lib" >> ${_MK}
: + echo "fi" >> ${_MK}
:
: I object to yet more offuscation being committed to src/release/Makefile.
: If you want to build a snapshot of HEAD, run a -CURRENT box. Things are
: getting messier and messier for 4->5 "support".
Doesn't look too complex to me. Core ruled a while ago that the
4->5/HEAD stuff that ru@ is doing is OK. Please resepect that
decision and don't complain. We all know that when the branch comes
lots of these hacks will go away and we also know that more hacks will
be needed. Since the branch is less than 4 months away, it just isn't
worth fighting over, and if it gets escalated to core@ or trb@ chances
are good you'll be told the same thing, like you were last time this
came up.
Unofficially yours,
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040116.114221.123967641.imp>