Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 14:27:15 +0200 From: Ruslan Shevchenko <Ruslan@Shevchenko.Kiev.UA> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: "Dan O'Connor" <dan@jgl.reno.nv.us>, Randall Senn <randall_senn@yahoo.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, webmaster@linux.org, www@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Unix vs unix-like and unix-type Message-ID: <36BC3523.A1AF934@Shevchenko.Kiev.UA> References: <051001be519e$66955d60$ed3ce4cf@danco.home> <19990206173822.J79703@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
e derived from Unix. > > NT is very definitely *not* UNIX, and it's not derived from it. But > it passes the specification for UNIX 95%. That's the point I was > making. I don't know where to find that, but you might try snooping > around the OpenGroup's web pages. > It was not NT, but OpenNT -- NT + new posix subsystem. look at http://www.opennt.com for details (sorry, I have no time to check this URL, so it can be incorrect). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36BC3523.A1AF934>