Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:39:37 +0300 From: dan_partelly <dan_partelly@rdsor.ro> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, <lev@FreeBSD.org>, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>, Sean Fagan <sef@ixsystems.com>, <freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8) Message-ID: <78fb431d2d9b568fd488fae51a1b5f23@rdsor.ro> In-Reply-To: <57164068.8080800@freebsd.org> References: <20160302235429.GD75641@FreeBSD.org> <57152CE5.5050500@FreeBSD.org> <9D4B9C8B-41D7-42BC-B436-D23EFFF60261@ixsystems.com> <20160418191425.GW1554@FreeBSD.org> <571533B8.6090109@freebsd.org> <20160418194010.GX1554@FreeBSD.org> <57153E80.4080800@FreeBSD.org> <571551AB.4070203@freebsd.org> <5715E1E9.8060507@freebsd.org> <57164068.8080800@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > What should not happen is that this incremental step forward be blocked > by those unwilling to hash out the next steps. > > -Alfred > > While incremental steps forward are great, how do you avoid situations like VNET, where a "good enough" enough implementation, usable in some scenarios lingered for years in kernel, but to this day it suffers from leaks and bugs. Once you go down the path of enabling it in this state, chances are that it will stay that way for more than half a decade.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?78fb431d2d9b568fd488fae51a1b5f23>