Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:59:37 -0500
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Ensel Sharon <user@dhp.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: tuning to run large (1000+) numbers of null_mounts
Message-ID:  <20060119065937.GA65484@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0601190149480.8684-100000@shell.dhp.com>
References:  <20060118201941.GA48904@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0601190149480.8684-100000@shell.dhp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 01:55:22AM -0500, Ensel Sharon wrote:
>=20
>=20
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>=20
> > > hmmm...the cut and paste of that loud warning was from a 6.0-RELEASE =
man
> > > page ... if I need to be CURRENT to get the updated man page, do I al=
so
> > > need to be CURRENT to get the safe null_mount code itself ?
> > >=20
> > > Or is 6.0-RELEASE safe ? (re: null_mount)
> > >=20
> > > Thanks a lot.
> >=20
> > 6.0-RELEASE is also safe.  I only just removed the warning the other
> > day, but I'll also be merging it to 6.0-STABLE.
>=20
>=20
> Ok, that is good to know.
>=20
> However, I continue to see instability on this system with the 2000+
> null_mounts.  Are there any system tunables / sysctls / kernel
> configurations that I should be studying or experimenting with that are
> relevant to this ?
>=20
> Perhaps looking more broadly, are there any tunables related to large
> numbers of mounted filesystems _period_, not just null mounts ?

Not that I know of.  You'll need to proceed down the debugging route I
mentioned.

> For what it is worth, the system also has several mdconfig'd and mounted
> snapshots (more than 5, less than 10).  Further, all of the null mounts
> mount space from within a mounted snapshot into normal filesystem space. =
=20
> With all the snapshots mounted and all the null mounts mounted, I find
> that commencing an rsync from the filesystem that all these exist on locks
> up the machine.  I can still ping it, but it refuses all connections.  It
> requires a power cycle.
>=20
> Comments ?

Snapshots are a much more likely cause of system instability than
nullfs mounts, IMO.

Kris


--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDzzjYWry0BWjoQKURAtMzAJ9EtHfIfYy1/adjxzrT04pXciehyQCg9UtG
1SZlrtqyHfgQw5t4jl6CGq4=
=90zd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060119065937.GA65484>