Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:00:29 -0800
From:      Peter Kieser <pfak@telus.net>
To:        Siddharth Aggarwal <saggarwa@cs.utah.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: process checkpoint restore facility now in DragonFly BSD
Message-ID:  <41E75FFD.1050403@telus.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.50L0.0501121412570.2985-100000@faith.cs.utah.edu>
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.50L0.0501121412570.2985-100000@faith.cs.utah.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
freebsd-hackers != DragonFly BSD Mailing List...

--Peter

Siddharth Aggarwal wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I am responding to a post back in Oct 2003 when the checkpointing feature
>was announced for DragonFly. I have been doing some research on this, and
>have seen some projects that use Xen VMM to achieve checkpoints of guest
>OSes.
>
>So I was looking for inputs from people as to what everyone feels about
>checkpointing, whether it should be done at the physical machine level or
>VM level. Pros and Cons of each approach, if any further development was
>done on DragonFly for checkpoint since then and if it was stopped, why?
>Are there serious limitations to checkpointing a physical machine?
>
>Sorry for such a vague posting, but I thought this would be a good
>platform to get some feedback.
>
>Thanks,
>Sid.
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>  
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41E75FFD.1050403>