Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:00:29 -0800 From: Peter Kieser <pfak@telus.net> To: Siddharth Aggarwal <saggarwa@cs.utah.edu> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: process checkpoint restore facility now in DragonFly BSD Message-ID: <41E75FFD.1050403@telus.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.50L0.0501121412570.2985-100000@faith.cs.utah.edu> References: <Pine.GSO.4.50L0.0501121412570.2985-100000@faith.cs.utah.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
freebsd-hackers != DragonFly BSD Mailing List... --Peter Siddharth Aggarwal wrote: >Hi all, > >I am responding to a post back in Oct 2003 when the checkpointing feature >was announced for DragonFly. I have been doing some research on this, and >have seen some projects that use Xen VMM to achieve checkpoints of guest >OSes. > >So I was looking for inputs from people as to what everyone feels about >checkpointing, whether it should be done at the physical machine level or >VM level. Pros and Cons of each approach, if any further development was >done on DragonFly for checkpoint since then and if it was stopped, why? >Are there serious limitations to checkpointing a physical machine? > >Sorry for such a vague posting, but I thought this would be a good >platform to get some feedback. > >Thanks, >Sid. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41E75FFD.1050403>