Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 11:05:52 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: James Bailie <jimmy@jamesbailie.com>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is not more FreeBSD software written in C++? Message-ID: <44430610.6010704@pacific.net.sg> In-Reply-To: <8664l991pf.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <200604151313.32519.benlutz@datacomm.ch> <4441199C.4090802@carebears.mine.nu> <44415038.4020101@jamesbailie.com> <8664l991pf.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > James Bailie <jimmy@jamesbailie.com> writes: >> Efficiency is of prime importance in systems programming. The >> only language in which one can write more efficient programs than >> in C, is assembler, but it's not portable. >=20 > This is a myth. I'm surprised to see it a Lisp programmer perpetuate it is a myth that assembler is not portable? Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44430610.6010704>