Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:37:00 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 229106] intr_event_handle is unsafe with respect to interrupt handler list Message-ID: <bug-229106-227-KOd5tiiLdt@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-229106-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-229106-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D229106 Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cem@freebsd.org --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> --- Just FYI for next time, if you're making code changes, fail_point(9) can ma= ke this kind of scenario much easier to hit. In particular, you can expand ra= ces by adding in an empty KFAIL_POINT_CODE() and then inducing a delay with sys= ctl my.failpoint=3D"50%delay(1000)" (i.e., DELAY(1000) 50% of times we hit that failpoint; the 50% can help avoid excessive foot-shooting). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-229106-227-KOd5tiiLdt>