Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 15:36:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Martin McCormick <martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: nsupdate not working at all with keys. Message-ID: <20020608153338.T11359-100000@master.gorean.org> In-Reply-To: <200206080111.g581B5w51411@dc.cis.okstate.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin McCormick wrote:
> I did get an answer and it is something everyone should
> watch for if they install bind9.2.1 .
>
> The port is fine but a few of the executables such as
> nsupdate end up in /usr/local/bin instead of /usr/local/sbin
> where the older nsupdate lives.
I think you mean /usr/sbin, which is where the nsupdate binary is
installed on the system. Neither BIND port installs nsupdate in
/usr/local/sbin.
> The new port puts man pages in /usr/local/man where as
> the older port had the same pages in /usr/share/man which makes
> your documentation out of sync.
I'm not sure what you mean by "the older port" here. System man
pages are in /usr/share/man, ports pages are in /usr/local/man. I'm
currently working on a knob to the BIND ports to install themselves over
the top of the system, that may help with the confusion, but then again it
may make it worse... who knows.
--
"We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power.
And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory."
- George W. Bush, President of the United States
State of the Union, January 28, 2002
Do YOU Yahoo!?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020608153338.T11359-100000>