Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:14:22 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Prafulla Deuskar <pdeuskar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h Message-ID: <20060804151422.GE96644@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20060804143825.GA8797@hub.freebsd.org> References: <200608031905.k73J55D2061870@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060804095414.GU96644@FreeBSD.org> <20060804143825.GA8797@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:38:25PM +0000, Prafulla Deuskar wrote: P> > P> Revert back changes to made in rev 1.109 of if_em.c which were unnecessary. P> > P> This makes it easier for us to get the changes into -current and to -stable quickly. P> > P> > Can you please confirm that this was a mechanical substitution like this: P> > P> > s/sc/adapter/g P> > s/em_softc/adapter/g P> > P> > and no more additional changes? If this is true, then I hope that we P> > (FreeBSD and Intel) have finally came to a common codebase. This is good. :) P> > I can stand the long unusual name for driver softc with no problems. P> P> Yes - it was a mechanical substitution. P> And thanks for taking care of 6.0.5 release. Thanks. Any objections about merging the HEAD to RELENG_6 soon? I'm going to wait for about a week to see whether any problems with 6.0.5 or not. Also I need to look at new defects that Coverity has found in if_em_hw.c after 6.0.5 import. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060804151422.GE96644>