Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 14:56:22 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219356] Using AES-GCM with IPSEC with aesni module loaded panics FreeBSD 11 stable Message-ID: <bug-219356-8-cnazvJaEME@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-219356-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-219356-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219356 Andrey V. Elsukov <ae@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ae@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Andrey V. Elsukov <ae@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to lab from comment #0) > Created attachment 182666 [details] > Core text file from panic >=20 > Using iperf to pass data between two hosts behind two FreeBSD gateways th= at > have an IPSec tunnel between them will panic gateway. The gateway that > panics os the one doing most of the decryption (gateway in front of iperf > running in server mode). I used iperf in UDP mode. Not sure if that is > needed. If I use 11.0-RELEASE-p9 I do not see this issue.=20 >=20 > I used strongswan to create IPSec tunnel between gateways. If duplicating, > make sure GCM option is turned on for strongswan. What revision do you use to build FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE and what strongswan version do you use? Does it panics immediately after starting iperf test or= it needs some time? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-219356-8-cnazvJaEME>