Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 00:55:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Benjamin Kaduk <bjk@FreeBSD.org> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: koobs@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r386873 - head/security/ca_root_nss/files Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1505210046290.22210@multics.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <555D5D1C.6000100@FreeBSD.org> References: <201505201808.t4KI8ajp012568@svn.freebsd.org> <555D4216.5060303@FreeBSD.org> <555D5504.3030106@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1505202354130.22210@multics.mit.edu> <555D5D1C.6000100@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 21 May 2015, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 5/20/15 10:58 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > > > The RFC Editor maintains a list of expansions of abbreviations: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt > > You mean like the actual TLS 1.2 RFC 5246? > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246 > > It has many hits for Certificate Authority and 0 for Certification Authority. Indeed it does, as does https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-05 On the other hand, https://cabforum.org/ and https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6961 are the other way. (I did not put much care into the selection of those two particular RFCs.) TLS can be (and is!) used outside of the web PKI, whereas the CA/Browser forum is at the heart of the web PKI. I did not see a concrete request for action on my part; please let me know if there is something you would like me to do. -Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.1.10.1505210046290.22210>