Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:39:51 -0400 From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7-STABLE mbuf corruption Message-ID: <CAFMmRNxpXvsH6tMtdFc%2BxDbm_mrKyHm1EJiwZR%2BEULnd1vPKQA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201109140740.17319.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <CACqU3MUs9Z9GeuGe=8iVp=MWV6eG-tO%2BkHb1znatsTq2uEqwvA@mail.gmail.com> <CACqU3MV7JRxQ_mNeHCk7RVyzETZLAcc3XL=xyZ-qqtPfRxkZeQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFMmRNwrD-v52iW5%2Bw_hbgL9battHjXSKcOWBTiMnBHM-cURXg@mail.gmail.com> <201109140740.17319.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:40 AM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > You should probably commit that. I've been meaning to post it to -current to see if somebody could come up with a better approach to solving the problem, but if you're happy with it, I'll submit it to re@. > I wonder if it should be a KASSERT() also so > that it outright panics on a kernel with INVARIANTS enabled so developers will > go fix their code as it seems to me to likely be a bug to enqueue a task that > many times. I can quite trivially reproduce this right now, so that would be something to consider after 9.0 branches off of HEAD.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFMmRNxpXvsH6tMtdFc%2BxDbm_mrKyHm1EJiwZR%2BEULnd1vPKQA>