Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:02:37 +0100 From: Vincent Hoffman <vince@unsane.co.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program Message-ID: <4FE8616D.2030002@unsane.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206251453070.78793@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191952250.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200618290.46371@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <26.30.12873.06EE2EF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> <20120621230302.GB575@hemlock.hydra> <loom.20120624T221657-6@post.gmane.org> <1340574699711-5721495.post@n5.nabble.com> <loom.20120625T143324-756@post.gmane.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206251453070.78793@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25/06/2012 13:56, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > C++ libraries can be limiting, but... wasn't replaced. > > If it would be truly about removing GPLv3 code that hurts, replacing > libstdc++ would be first thing to do. I assume you mean like the new libc++? http://wiki.freebsd.org/NewC%2B%2BStack > > For now we have removed GPL code that doesn't hurt > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FE8616D.2030002>