Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 07:26:40 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Navdeep Parhar <np@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r251191 - in stable/9/sys: conf x86/acpica Message-ID: <201306010726.41079.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <51A8F7EF.8030804@FreeBSD.org> References: <201305311913.r4VJDNCx025746@svn.freebsd.org> <51A8F7EF.8030804@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, May 31, 2013 03:20:15 PM Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On 05/31/13 12:13, John Baldwin wrote: > > Author: jhb > > Date: Fri May 31 19:13:22 2013 > > New Revision: 251191 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/251191 > > > > Log: > > MFC 246805: > > Make VM_NDOMAIN a kernel option so that it can be enabled from a kernel > > config file. > > Is this going to live long in 9? Or will be replaced with MAXMEMDOM > like it was in head? I do not expect the NUMA changes in 10 to be merged to 9. We could perhaps rename the option here to match, though they have different semantics (the old stuff is first-touch rather than round-robin). There are actually folks using the older stuff in production it turns out (not just my employer), so having it as an option still makes sense I think. If avoiding a future name change seems more important then I'm fine with merging the name change. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201306010726.41079.jhb>