Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 18:26:41 +0300 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com>, Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD Message-ID: <AANLkTinDb0lwLDIXDXUhcYV5SrpLxuFmVW6ES7B06Hwv@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100531151841.GA56247@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20100529130240.GA99732@freebsd.org> <AANLkTinmNl-csPP8pp-zhAVJ3Kqe1mTbK6J5tqstDdCK@mail.gmail.com> <20100531144938.GA55909@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4C03D0C0.4050306@andric.com> <20100531151841.GA56247@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Doesn't this imply that clang/llvm isn't quite ready for deployment. > Being able to boot a complete clang/llvm compiled FreeBSD system > would seem to be critical. This is why clang would be turned off by default. This import is just making it easier to test the clangbsd branch. I'm all for this change (and when it happens I'll start testing clangbsd). -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinDb0lwLDIXDXUhcYV5SrpLxuFmVW6ES7B06Hwv>