Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:51:46 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: LEI CHEN <adam.chen@tpg.com.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: about the tmpmfs="YES" in rc.conf Message-ID: <20041110155146.GA60145@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> In-Reply-To: <1100101672.8070.12.camel@Tany.tabcuz.net> References: <1100098727.8070.5.camel@Tany.tabcuz.net> <20041110150727.GA33927@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <1100101672.8070.12.camel@Tany.tabcuz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-11-11 02:17, LEI CHEN <adam.chen@tpg.com.au> wrote: >On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 01:37, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2004-11-11 01:28, LEI CHEN <adam.chen@tpg.com.au> wrote: >>> I have just upgraded to 5-stable branch, and I noticed that the >>> tmpmfs="YES" and tmpsize="20m" options can be put into /etc/rc.conf >>> directly to create a memory file system automatically. >> >> Yesterday, I have committed a couple of enhancements to the tmpmfs in >> CURRENT. If you plan on using tmpmfs="YES", mail me privately and I'll >> tell you how to merge the changes with your existing setup once the tmpmfs >> stuff is merged from CURRENT to RELENG_5 (in a few days). > > I've just added those two options into /etc/rc.conf and commented out the > line in /etc/fstab. > > It works! :) > > df -h output is : > Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on > ... > ... > /dev/md0 31M 16k 28M 0% /tmp > > I am just wondering what would be the mfs size that suitable for me? > I have PIII 850 256MB laptop. That depends on what you usually do with temporary stuff in /tmp. The cpu speed doesn't have anything to do with this ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041110155146.GA60145>