Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 14:47:27 +0200 From: Sylvestre Gallon <ccna.syl@gmail.com> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 163077 for review Message-ID: <164b4c9c0905300547q6036b6dax710c1bce47599852@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200905301428.54367.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <200905301128.n4UBSGad022347@repoman.freebsd.org> <200905301428.54367.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> wrote: > On Saturday 30 May 2009, Sylvestre Gallon wrote: >> + ret = libusb20_dev_process(devh->os_priv); >> + if (ret == 0 || LIBUSB20_ERROR_NO_DEVICE) > > ret == LIBUSB20_ERROR_NO_DEVICE > > One note: > > libusb20 is not thread safe. So you might need an additional lock for that, > I.E. when you call libusb20_dev_process() and libusb20_tr_submit()++ must be > atomic. If this cannot be solved in libusb10, I will do something. > > --HPS > Ok, I will add a mutex for libusb20. Cheers, -- Sylvestre Gallon (http://devsyl.blogspot.com) Fifth Grade Student @ Epitech & Researcher @ LSE R&D @ Rathaxes (http://www.rathaxes.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?164b4c9c0905300547q6036b6dax710c1bce47599852>