Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:51:42 -0600 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> Cc: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com>, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?] Message-ID: <20060327185142.GC24315@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <200603271215.56344.joao@matik.com.br> References: <20060324223317.2069564f@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <200603271106.45088.joao@matik.com.br> <20060327142642.C2181@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <200603271215.56344.joao@matik.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 12:15:55PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > well, the actual driver is trash and unusable and overall crashes SMP > systems ... so more testing to see if it crashes more? ;) As with any other software development project, you have to draw a line somewhere and say "these things will be in the release and these things will not be in the release"; otherwise, you will never have a release at all. I am not familiar with the code in this case but if its inclusion changed enough other things in the system where _everything_ had to be re-tested then it's not worth the regression. These are just the simple facts of (any) software development. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060327185142.GC24315>