Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 05 Sep 2003 22:47:24 +0200
From:      des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/rescue/rescue Makefile
Message-ID:  <xzpekyvq7xf.fsf@dwp.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <3F58B8B7.30107@tcoip.com.br> (Daniel C. Sobral's message of "Fri, 05 Sep 2003 13:24:23 -0300")
References:  <42548.1062488547@critter.freebsd.dk> <20030902004917.S6074@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <3F58B8B7.30107@tcoip.com.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br> writes:
> I recall bde being in favour of respecting English rules, meaning
> NOOPTIONS. :-)
>
> So this consensus isn't at all all that consensual.

ISTR bde was pretty much alone on his side of the fence.

A prime example of why NOFOO is a bad idea, BTW, is the (now obsolete)
NODESCRYPTLINKS option.  I keep reading that first part as "nodes"
instead of "no DES", and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpekyvq7xf.fsf>