Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 03:21:11 +0100 From: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ports-i386@dosirak.kr.freebsd.org: zh-chinput2-1.3.1 failed on i386 5] Message-ID: <200412010321.11891.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <20041201010904.GA81098@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041129195108.GC8315@xor.obsecurity.org> <200412010158.03269.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <20041201010904.GA81098@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 01 of December 2004 02:09, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:58:03AM +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 of December 2004 01:19, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:12:34AM +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > > > This one needs to add imake to BUILD_DEPENDS. I've notified the > > > > maintainer. > > > > > > > > Dejan > > > > > > Thanks for looking at these. If you're not already doing so, add > > > these to the latest version of your patch so we can commit them all at > > > once when we're ready to go. > > > > > > Kris > > > > I was worried that it would put too much into single patch/commit, but > > I'll merge it if it's preferred. I'll look into other errors and notify > > maintainers. It seems that it's either missing imake or not building html > > man pages that were in plists. > > It's best to be able to commit them all at once instead of leaving a > window where a number of ports will be broken for an indeterminate > timeperiod. > > Kris Ah, I see. Then how about this: there appear to be basicaly two cathegories of breaks. First are the ones that can be commited even before xorg upgrade (like rosegarden and zh-chinput2). Rosegarden is maintained by ports so I thought of waiting a day or so if someone objects or comes up with better idea, and then commit it. (and during writing this it seems that fix for libxklavier was commited). I intended to notify maintainers of the ones that are maintained and if we don't hear from them until the time xorg is ready for commit I can commit them separately, but at the same time (if they respond earlier, the commits can also be done earlier). Another ones are closely related to commit (like ja-kdrill) since their plist changes as consequence of not installing html man pages. These should be commited together with upgrade and I can merge those into the patch and notify maintainers that this will be done. Would that be acceptable? Dejan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200412010321.11891.dejan.lesjak>