Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:01:58 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@acm.org> To: Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com> Cc: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now Message-ID: <20100420110158.GD37576@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <x2za0777e081004200039z69fb39f8rb598e296d74ab8e3@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100419122820.GA53253@freebsd.org> <permail-20100419155822f7e55a9d00000470-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de> <x2za0777e081004200039z69fb39f8rb598e296d74ab8e3@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--L6iaP+gRLNZHKoI4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2010-Apr-20 10:39:26 +0300, Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com> wrote: >> i was also wondering: what's the reason gcc is still being used during s= tep >> "Building an up-to-date make(1)" and not clang? > >because make segfaults when using clang ;) (On amd64) I've discovered this as well. It does somewhat restrict the usefulness of ClangBSD though. --=20 Peter Jeremy --L6iaP+gRLNZHKoI4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkvNiaYACgkQ/opHv/APuIf4YgCgnYszGSaFGmDe0NwOYyXu/vvv zI8AoJ+bgmSbYGpMO8dNQGuW0Ox/V5b5 =2Ndl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --L6iaP+gRLNZHKoI4--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100420110158.GD37576>