Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 May 1999 14:00:55 -0500
From:      Jacques Vidrine <n@nectar.cc>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Cc:        junkmale@xtra.co.nz, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FTP passive mode - a new default? 
Message-ID:  <19990528190055.3C3CBB740@spawn.nectar.cc>
In-Reply-To: <xzpn1ypo0v7.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no> 
References:  <19990526182800.EGOX7623210.mta2-rme@wocker> <xzpn1ypo0v7.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On 28 May 1999 at 14:05, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> wrote:
> FTP servers which do not accept passive mode are, IMHO, broken. Their
> loss.

I'll second that opinion.  Netscape and Microsoft browsers, at least,
have been using passive FTP for years (1994 or earlier).  One could
argue that these are the most used FTP clients in the world, and has
made passive mode a de facto requirement for public FTP servers.

Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.cc / nectar@FreeBSD.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990528190055.3C3CBB740>