Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Jul 1998 18:14:49 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Greg Pavelcak <gpavelcak@philos.umass.edu>
To:        Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <dag-erli@ifi.uio.no>
Cc:        "Jan B. Koum " <jkb@best.com>, Dennis Reiter <mcneills@accessus.net>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: QPopper exploit
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.01.9807271810090.254-100000@tower.my.domain>
In-Reply-To: <xzplnpf59fc.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Mon, 27 Jul 1998, Dag-Erling Coidan [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote:

> "Jan B. Koum " <jkb@best.com> writes:
> > 	Every computer which is somehow connected to any network (be it
> > Internet or not) must have proper security in place. If you think you not
> > going to get broken into for whatever reason .. guess what? Yes.
> 
> You know that, and I know that, and I'm sure quite a few other readers
> of this list know that. But you'd be amazed to know how many people
> believe that crackers will overlook them just because they're on a
> dialup.
Me, for example. But the question is what constitutes "proper
security" for a run-of-the-mill pc-user (well equipped with
FreeBSD as his OS) who only goes on-line to fetch his mail and do
a little surfing.

> 
> If I were a cracker, the first thing I'd try would be to scan IP
> ranges known to belong to large ISPs' dialup servers, precisely for
> that reason (and also because there's a much higher chance of finding
> machines run by inexperienced or careless people there than amongst
> permanently connected hosts)

Hmm, major universities for example? (He asks through his UMass
PPP account.)

> 
> DES
> -- 
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav - dag-erli@ifi.uio.no
> 

Greg


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.01.9807271810090.254-100000>