Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 16:27:32 -0400 From: Coleman Kane <cokane@FreeBSD.org> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add main.c pkg_add.1 src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/create main.c pkg_create.1 src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/delete main.c pkg_delete.1 src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info main.c pkg_info.1 ... Message-ID: <1212179252.1967.1.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <48405C4B.3050603@FreeBSD.org> References: <200805301426.m4UEQ92d025434@repoman.freebsd.org> <48405C4B.3050603@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-TWbWsYV713LEX+16nd2o Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 12:58 -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > I am curious what is our policy on using long options in the base system=20 > (if any)? I believe that pkg_install is the first non-contributed base=20 > system utility to actually widely use it. For some reason I've got=20 > impression that use of getopt_long is considered "the Linux/GNU way",=20 > this API provided for compatibility purposes and its use in base system=20 > is discouraged. Quick grep through /use/src seemingly supports that. >=20 > Can someone confirm/reject? >=20 > Florent Thoumie wrote: > > flz 2008-05-30 14:26:09 UTC > >=20 > > FreeBSD src repository > >=20 > > Modified files: > > usr.sbin/pkg_install/add main.c pkg_add.1=20 > > usr.sbin/pkg_install/create main.c pkg_create.1=20 > > usr.sbin/pkg_install/delete main.c pkg_delete.1=20 > > usr.sbin/pkg_install/info main.c pkg_info.1=20 > > usr.sbin/pkg_install/lib lib.h=20 > > usr.sbin/pkg_install/updating main.c pkg_updating.1=20 > > usr.sbin/pkg_install/version main.c pkg_version.1=20 > > Log: > > - Add long options to pkg_install. > > - Remove check for '-?' as it's not listed in authorized options. > > - Bump PKG_INSTALL_VERSION to 20080530. >=20 > -Maxim >=20 I am not sure about policy, however I do appreciate the long options sometimes. Primarily, I think they are useful (in a self-documenting way) for use in shell scripts. I tend to prefer the single-char options when I am doing the administration myself. --=20 Coleman Kane --=-TWbWsYV713LEX+16nd2o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkhAYy8ACgkQcMSxQcXat5cZSACeL4398bDr9L3sOYP6gHuFukuF L4sAn0nmBa6V1N5RQd1CtRWgkDMA3RB1 =gwdo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-TWbWsYV713LEX+16nd2o--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1212179252.1967.1.camel>