Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:33:38 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Eugene Kazarinov <kamuzon@milshop.ru> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Polling and em0 Message-ID: <20060918173154.S94143@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <519867a90609170920x51726e74k6f86f2661965fd03@mail.gmail.com> References: <op.tfzin5x2zq5pz4@sovaio.netoldies.com> <450CE15B.3060806@thebeastie.org> <519867a90609170920x51726e74k6f86f2661965fd03@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Eugene Kazarinov wrote: EK> > dell1# cat /dev/zero | dd bs=1m | nc dell2 3000 EK> > ^C0+18456 records in EK> > 0+18455 records out EK> > 1209466880 bytes transferred in 12.459299 secs (97,073,429 bytes/sec) EK> EK> EK> Do you meen that from 6.2 I dont need polling for fastest performance? We had opposite experience, at least in situation when 1 Gbps RELENG_6 router have to route a LOT of small packets from a few thousands of residential ethernet customers... We have bge instead of em though. Maybe it's time to experiment further now. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060918173154.S94143>