Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 10:27:53 +0200 (SAT) From: Robert Nordier <rnordier@nordier.com> To: grog@lemis.com (Greg Lehey) Cc: pechter@shell.monmouth.com, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UNIX 95 Message-ID: <199805140827.KAA10596@ceia.nordier.com> In-Reply-To: <19980514115056.V320@freebie.lemis.com> from Greg Lehey at "May 14, 98 11:50:56 am"
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 1998 at 22:16:00 -0400, Bill/Carolyn Pechter wrote:
> >> It's been that way for a long time. UNIX 95%. Trick question: which
> >> of these operating systems may *not* be called UNIX 95%?
> >>
> >> FreeBSD
> >> IBM OS/390 (formerly MVS)
> >> Microsoft Windows NT
> >> System V
> >>
> >> Hint: only one of them may not.
> >>
> >> Greg
> >
> > I know it's FreeBSD... but has WinNT made Unix95 certification?
>
> Yup. It doesn't say much about UNIX 95, does it?
The current official UNIX95 list (by vendor) is:
BULL AIX
DIGITAL Digital UNIX
HITACHI HI-UX/WE2
HP HP-UX
IBM AIX; OS/390
NCR NCR UNIX; Solaris
NEC UX/4800
SCO UnixWare
SGI IRIX 6.5
SNI BS2000/OSD; Reliant UNIX
SPISI Reliant UNIX
SUN Solaris
Having had some dealings with the Open Group, I think they do a good
(though frequently misunderstood) job on the whole.
FreeBSD is far from compliance, as regards many standards:
principally because of a distinct lack of interest, although lack
of great piles of ready cash is also a factor.
--
Robert Nordier
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805140827.KAA10596>