Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:32:50 +0100 From: Fleuriot Damien <ml@my.gd> To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: make release doesn't correctly include EXTLOCALDIR ? Message-ID: <40B04B98-5651-40DB-BD73-2C6E16DA6795@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <B8D905E7-3EAD-4A31-B535-E284E9A91C74@my.gd> References: <B8D905E7-3EAD-4A31-B535-E284E9A91C74@my.gd>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 11, 2013, at 2:06 PM, Fleuriot Damien <ml@my.gd> wrote: > Hello list, >=20 >=20 > I'm running 8.3-stable r245223 from a mere 2 days ago and am in the = process of building a custom release for our internal use as = preconfigured firewalls. >=20 > "make release" works pretty fine except for a few quirks here and = there. >=20 >=20 >=20 > First of all, I have set EXTLOCALDIR so that the release contains my = existing /usr/local/ , and thus the collection of installed ports. >=20 > The problem here is that while /release/usr/local/ is correctly = populated, the ISO images and ftp install directory have an empty = usr/local/ > Extracting the ISO's base.?? files doesn't yield the /usr/local/ = contents either. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > The second problem I encounter is with the kernel's build. > Apparently "make release" doesn't pull MODULES_OVERRIDE from = /etc/make.conf and decides to build every single module, as opposed to = my own restricted list. >=20 > I'm going to try with with KERNEL_FLAGS=3D-DMODULES_OVERRIDE module1 = module2 in /usr/src/release/Makefile >=20 >=20 >=20 > Has anyone else ever experienced the same problem regarding the = inclusion of /usr/local/ in their release ? >=20 Reposting to -stable in the hope of getting feedback, having received = none on -questions. Has anyone experienced this before ? Is this intended behaviour ? I fail to see the purpose of including /usr/local/ if it won't be = packaged into the release images.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40B04B98-5651-40DB-BD73-2C6E16DA6795>