Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:32:22 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: Alexander Nedotsukov <bland@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: umass problem. Message-ID: <200911081432.24072.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <D75328A3-1C22-4277-987C-4B633DAF948E@freebsd.org> References: <202969100caf7f0bb8098572b0dad622@mail> <200911070109.28595.hselasky@c2i.net> <D75328A3-1C22-4277-987C-4B633DAF948E@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 08 November 2009 14:24:39 Alexander Nedotsukov wrote: > Just curious, is there is no way to detect lost interrupt in new usb > stack quickly or check in the old one was not correct anyway? Hi, The check might not be correct, because new jobs can be queued immediately after the interrupt, and in that case it is not correct to check of the number of jobs is zero. --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200911081432.24072.hselasky>