Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:52:14 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys namei.h src/sys/kern vfs_syscalls.c Message-ID: <20050413195214.GC60345@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <18260.1113396655@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20050413081543.S28571@mail.chesapeake.net> <18260.1113396655@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> [050413 05:51] wrote: > In message <20050413081543.S28571@mail.chesapeake.net>, Jeff Roberson writes: > >On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > >> * Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> [050412 23:22] wrote: > >> > On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >> > > >> > > Thank you very much. I'll update the docs when you're done. > >> > > >> > Don't you only need to know which calls are going to open, or do you also > >> > need modifying ops like unlike and rename? > >> > >> Autofs does not support rename and unlink semantics were not as > >> important as being able to differentiate between open(2) and stat(2). > > > >So would an ISOPEN flag work? We could do this rather than replace NOOBJ > >in every syscall you don't care about. I'm trying to figure out if the > >positive cases are fewer than the negative. > > ISOPEN gets my vote. The name change is fine. Right now my schedule is too hectic to verify that if you change the actual places its used if it will still work for what it's needed for. I know what was there seemed to work great. -- - Alfred Perlstein - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050413195214.GC60345>