Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:22:16 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ata0-raid oddness. Message-ID: <20040131082216.GG18624@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpbrous0tw.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0401231406000.41030-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <40119E16.1010802@FreeBSDsystems.COM> <xzpbrous0tw.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 12:27:07AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Lanny Baron <lnb@FreeBSDsystems.COM> writes: > > That is correct. ad0 and ad1 are subdisks of respective ar* > > it is *not* correct - ad0 and ad1 should not be shown when they are > members of an active array, as any attempt to partition and label them > directly is likely to corrupt the array. older ATA didn't show the members of an active array. ATAng started showing them. :-( I asked sos about it and he said they'ed be exposed for a while until he finished some things he was working on. Maybe sos can update us on the state of things and the plans.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040131082216.GG18624>