Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 21:14:04 +0100 (MET) From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.win.tue.nl> To: vadim@tversu.ac.ru (Vadim Kolontsov) Cc: Guido.vanRooij@nl.cis.philips.com, jgreco@solaria.sol.net, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, core@freebsd.org, security@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.1.6+++: crt0.c CRITICAL CHANGE Message-ID: <199702052014.VAA17521@gvr.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970205194827.25582A-100000@mailserv.tversu.ac.ru> from Vadim Kolontsov at "Feb 5, 97 07:55:52 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Yes, but why not to use lfix only for static binaries? I can add > checking if binary statically or dynamic linked. Also we can include a > patched and recompiled version of libc into archive. > Of course, problem with _static_ binaries which uses setlocale() > _by itself_ is still exists... this binaries need recompilation.. any > ideas? Are there any such programs in FreeBSD distribution? Both statically and dynamically binaries suffer from the problem... -Guido
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702052014.VAA17521>