Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 05:05:07 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: peter@netplex.com.au Cc: steve@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/libshhcards Makefile ports/games/libshhcards/patches patch-aa ports/games/libshhcards/pkg PLIST Message-ID: <199809281205.FAA26998@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <199809281151.TAA04166@spinner.netplex.com.au> (message from Peter Wemm on Mon, 28 Sep 1998 19:51:21 %2B0800)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* The micro version number is ignored in a.out executable headers. 1.0.3 ->
* 1.0 is perfectly fine from the executable's perspective. The only thing
* that cares is ldconfig, it'll choose the highest micro version number when
* building it's pathname cache. However, I suspect 1.0 is treated as 1.0.0
* and an old 1.0.3 will be found in preference to 1.0.
That was what I was afraid about. :<
===
## ldconfig -r | grep shh
149:-lshhcards.1.0 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libshhcards.so.1.0.3
## lg /usr/X11R6/lib/libshhcards.so.*
272 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 262900 Sep 28 04:33 /usr/X11R6/lib/libshhcards.so.1.0
272 -r--r--r-- 1 bin bin 262900 Aug 22 09:31 /usr/X11R6/lib/libshhcards.so.1.0.3
===
Steve, can you bump this to 1.1 for a.out? (No need to change the ELF
version -- this is not the usual "bump" we are talking about.)
As for the others, the package building machine's /usr/{local,X11R6}/lib
only contains the following:
libkpathsea.so.3.2.0
librexx.so.1.6.4
libxdelta.so.0.22.0
Vanilla said he's going to fix xdelta. The others don't have their
two-version siblings in there so I guess they aren't converted yet.
Does anyone remember which ones had their micro version number
(especially if it was nonzero) truncated? :<
Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809281205.FAA26998>