Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:45:06 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <TrimYourCc@NUXI.com> To: Alex Zepeda <jazepeda@pacbell.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -CURRENT is bad for me... Message-ID: <20010212164506.C3038@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010212162004.A9106@zippy.mybox.zip>; from jazepeda@pacbell.net on Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:20:04PM -0800 References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010212170101.11435B-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> <200102122220.f1CMKUm01666@mass.dis.org> <20010212162004.A9106@zippy.mybox.zip>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:20:04PM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> How is this more acceptable than bumping the major number? Are they
> really so precious that they can only be incremented once for a release
> cycle?
Yes. I don't want to be in a position where we wonder what happened to
libc.so.5 when I don't see it in my /usr/lib/ or /usr/lib/compat/
> Seems to me that a new major number is far cleaner than a gross hack.
I am very against this.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010212164506.C3038>