Date: 03 Nov 2000 10:59:32 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no> Cc: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Randell Jesup <rjesup@wgate.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Like to commit my diskprep Message-ID: <xzplmv1l6kb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Marius Bendiksen's message of "Thu, 2 Nov 2000 22:14:00 %2B0100 (CET)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10011022211110.13255-100000@login-1.eunet.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no> writes: > > e.g. there wouldn't be a whole lot of need for a 10G /usr. Once hard > > drives got big enough I just left it at 2G. > > This is a matter of preference (hence the reference to paint) and also the > use intended for the system in question. However, the code is not going to > be significantly more complex due to this, and I think it's a much better, > ie cleaner, way of doing it. One question that probably interests many of us is, can tuning those numbers reduce fsck time? Is fsck time strictly proportional to disk size, or does the number of inodes and/or cylinder groups affect it? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzplmv1l6kb.fsf>