Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:35:25 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: Brett Bump <bbump@rsts.org>, Andre Albsmeier <Andre.Albsmeier@siemens.com>, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org>, scottl@freebsd.org, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x Message-ID: <20080422133525.GR18958@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <480D3D5F.3060704@samsco.org> References: <47B5F7BF.9050608@FreeBSD.org> <20080219145105.C96725@mail.rsts.org> <20080220172216.GM57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20080221030314.Q2297@mail.rsts.org> <20080221121322.GO57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20080422103145.GA17645@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20080422115407.GP18958@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <480DD532.9000203@FreeBSD.org> <20080422121145.GQ18958@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <480D3D5F.3060704@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--a8kRBn33jkh2Wtq5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 07:20:31PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > Kostik Belousov wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:08:18PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>Kostik Belousov wrote: > >>>On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:31:45PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > >>>>On Thu, 21-Feb-2008 at 14:13:22 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > >>>>>On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:20:04AM -0700, Brett Bump wrote: > >>>>>>On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>I cannot reproduce it locally. With patch applied, it compiles both > >>>>>>>GENERIC and GENERIC with options QUOTA added just fine. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Check for partially applied patch. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>Thanks Kostik. You can double check me on sizes, but it would appe= ar=20 > >>>>>>that > >>>>>>all files in the patch were touched, and I double checked my source= s=20 > >>>>>>with: > >>>>>>ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.2-RELEASE/src whi= ch=20 > >>>>>>are > >>>>>The patch is against RELENG_6, not against RELENG_6_2. I see no point > >>>>>in backporting it to RELENG_6_2. > >>>>> > >>>>>BTW, I backported two fixes, one for another deadlock with snapshots= =20 > >>>>>and > >>>>>quotas, another for "ffs_blkfree: block already freed" panic and=20 > >>>>>followed > >>>>>up fsck: softdep inconsistency error. > >>>>> > >>>>>New combined patch (against RELENG_6) is at > >>>>>http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quotagiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20080221-1= 202.patch > >>>>I tried to apply this patch to recent RELENG_6 sources > >>>>but it failed at a lot of places. I think this is due to > >>>>changes to the tree after the above patch was made. > >>>> > >>>>Is there any newer patch available or is it possible to make > >>>>one which applies to recent RELENG_6 sources? > >>>http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quotagiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20080422-100= 0.patch > >>> > >>>May be, I shall commit it finally. > >>FYI scottl@ was asking about this yesterday, and seemed interested in= =20 > >>helping you to get it committed if necessary. > > > >My worry is the possible mismerge. I do prefer to commit it now, after > >some authoritative "no problem seen" message. >=20 > I'll merge it into the FreeBSD 6 tree at Yahoo, get some testing done on= =20 > it, and then let you know how it goes. Thank you ! --a8kRBn33jkh2Wtq5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkgN6Z0ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4g9lwCg5kKDmFogvi/GBtkYjt1BI0EA ycYAoMzfTVfHFlYUU/Wp+ud8u/WbMH/C =RYR9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8kRBn33jkh2Wtq5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080422133525.GR18958>