Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:15:57 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: Richy Kim <richy@apple.com>, libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: packagetool.tcl Message-ID: <20010619191557.B667@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> In-Reply-To: <20010619115903.F65489@bohr.physics.purdue.edu>; from will@physics.purdue.edu on Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:59:03AM -0500 References: <20010614124213.A41047@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <200106141756.KAA11439@scv3.apple.com> <20010615171239.B935@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> <20010619115903.F65489@bohr.physics.purdue.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Will Andrews (will@physics.purdue.edu): > > everything is possible from TCL (kinda easy once OpenPackages has a > > package system .-) ) > I'm curious. What part of OP do you intend to merge? AFAIK libh > is a package library and as such would be part of OP, not the other > way around. libh's package library completely uses TCL for everything. OpenPackages wants its own packaging format, so we have to support OpenPackages format in libh's libs. I'm not happy about this (since libh's package stuff already works), but it happened, that a second group wanted to create a new package format. You know, I'm now strongly participating in OP's package format work, so that the ideas in libh aren't lost. Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010619191557.B667>