Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 12:07:50 -0500 From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org> To: cem@FreeBSD.org Cc: "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r300062 - in head/sys: gnu/fs modules modules/reiserfs Message-ID: <929e781b-fd6b-462f-31f7-8985aeaf1fae@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAG6CVpU-oV7p4PutZ%2BtQtAyx%2Bu-aeaLfj8=0qoktyar6CJYTQA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201605171536.u4HFae3R084696@repo.freebsd.org> <7ba425bb-6dc8-f56f-1353-abd7291cdb5e@FreeBSD.org> <CAG6CVpU-oV7p4PutZ%2BtQtAyx%2Bu-aeaLfj8=0qoktyar6CJYTQA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/17/16 11:50, Conrad Meyer wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> Log: >>> Kill off ReiserFS as it is no longer supported, for obvious reasons. >>> >> >> It's not so obvious since the fs worked and could've been useful for >> people migrating from ancient linux. > > This may still be possible through e.g. sysutils/fusefs-lkl (ReiserFS > isn't included in the port yet, but it's possible that it could be). > And that's a pretty cool port but since it's not base it involves adding a package and some digging for documentation. Quite honestly, it's a pretty hypothetical situation. By far the most common migration cases are ext4 (which is covered by base) and XFS. We should make fusefs-lkl more visible. Pedro.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?929e781b-fd6b-462f-31f7-8985aeaf1fae>