Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:30:57 +0900
From:      gnn@freebsd.org
To:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE)
Message-ID:  <m2is8u9upa.wl@minion.local.neville-neil.com>
In-Reply-To: <20041028223229.GC2063@empiric.icir.org>
References:  <20041027073858.GC719@empiric.icir.org> <417FF6D6.4010201@elischer.org> <20041027195233.GC770@empiric.icir.org> <20041028114134.GC50262@cell.sick.ru> <20041028223229.GC2063@empiric.icir.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail 

At Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:32:29 -0700,
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> Please see my attached game plan.
> 

I think it looks like a good plan.  Unnumbered interfaces have other
uses than dhclient and it would be good to have clean support for
them.

Later,
George
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2is8u9upa.wl>