Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:30:57 +0900 From: gnn@freebsd.org To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE) Message-ID: <m2is8u9upa.wl@minion.local.neville-neil.com> In-Reply-To: <20041028223229.GC2063@empiric.icir.org> References: <20041027073858.GC719@empiric.icir.org> <417FF6D6.4010201@elischer.org> <20041027195233.GC770@empiric.icir.org> <20041028114134.GC50262@cell.sick.ru> <20041028223229.GC2063@empiric.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:32:29 -0700, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > Please see my attached game plan. > I think it looks like a good plan. Unnumbered interfaces have other uses than dhclient and it would be good to have clean support for them. Later, George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2is8u9upa.wl>