Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:18:10 +0000 From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> To: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Shawn Webb <lattera@gmail.com> Subject: Re: ZFS / zpool size Message-ID: <CAFHbX1LMCPhkEYH=rHbC9bct8mWVSFo2_-brfquvfQKK9bUr-w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAMVU60ahgmyK60h83jN9r0VYAWROnMtuz5K_1db0_p=EUZUm5Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAMVU60ZtHp%2B_mhuUh-5RuLNW9XFRxBdfQxXu9vPEzw-P%2BrLUUw@mail.gmail.com> <CADt0fhyg8uXQG8SjWPL2DizZRNTdN9poRjo8Y=c62vN4W7iK6w@mail.gmail.com> <CAMVU60ahgmyK60h83jN9r0VYAWROnMtuz5K_1db0_p=EUZUm5Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@gmail.com> wrote: > A overhead of almost 300GB? That seems a bit to much, don't you think? > The pool consist of one vdev with two 1,5TB disks and one 3TB in raidz1. > Confused about your disks - can you show the output of zpool status. If you have a raidz of N disks with a minimum size of Y GB, you can expect ``zpool list'' to show a size of N*Y and ``zfs list'' to show a size of roughly (N-1)*Y. So, on my box with 2 x 6 x 1.5 TB drives in raidz, I see a zpool size of 16.3 TB, and a zfs size of 13.3 TB. Cheers Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFHbX1LMCPhkEYH=rHbC9bct8mWVSFo2_-brfquvfQKK9bUr-w>