Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Thu, 2 Oct 1997 23:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:      asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
To:        dg@root.com
Cc:        rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: CVSUP vs. SNAPS
Message-ID:  <199710030621.XAA12545@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <199710021544.IAA21048@implode.root.com> (message from David Greenman on Thu, 02 Oct 1997 08:44:23 -0700)
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail 

 *    No, "2.2" refers to the branch, not to a release. I think we make that
 * pretty clear.

Yep.  Besides, what are we going to call 3.0-CURRENT before the 3.0
release then?  (2.9999-CURRENT? :)  It's going to be 3.0-CURRENT for a
while after the release, and we'll have the same "problem".  That is
not going to be solved by confusing the release and branch names.

Satoshi
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710030621.XAA12545>