Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 23:57:44 +0000 (GMT) From: Ali Alaoui El Hassani <961BE653994@stud.alakhawayn.ma> To: Harold Gutch <logix@foobar.franken.de> Cc: openzero@bsdmail.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Firewalls and the endless story! Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1000707235611.7518K-100000@stud.alakhawayn.ma> In-Reply-To: <20000707225520.B25629@foobar.franken.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hey Hey,
I like FreeBSD, I do not allow anybody to say anything bad about it
ok
You Better Watch out
with FreeBSD
okAY
On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Harold Gutch wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 12:26:24PM +0100, openzero@bsdmail.com wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 03:57:22PM -0500, Chris Dillon wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, and the original poster demonstrated even further stupidity
> > > by adding a proprietary product (SecureBSD 1.0) into the mix and
> > > then expect that we support it.
> > >
> > > "Works for me."
> > >
> >
> > Yeah!
> > Thanks for the wonderful word "stupidity", but hey!
> > I think, after using FreeBSD-2.2.8, FreeBSD-3.4,
> > FreeBSD-4.0, that FreeBSD-2.2.8-STABLE is the best
> > for MYSELF! What you do, is not by business!
> > You are an architect! Are these the only words
> > you can use? I know, that SecureBSD isn't supported
> > by FreeBSD.org, coz it's not a product of
> > FreeBSD.org and it's only a preview!
> >
> > (German: Als Architekt hätte ich schon mal gerne
> > eine gehobenere Ausdrucksweise erwartet und
> > keine Kindergartenbegründungen wie: das ist doof!
> > Um unwiederständlich klarzumachen: Ich stehe unter
> > großem Zeitdruck und bisher konnte mir noch kein
> > Mensch einen wirklich guten Tip geben! Das stellt mich
> > unter Spannung, was solche Ausdrucksweisen natürlich noch mehr aggressiv macht!)
>
> Perhaps your spelling ("coz", "rulez" etc.) is the reason for
> people being "ignorant" towards you. For me that - and the lack
> of a realname in your mail's headers - were two reasons (among
> others like lack of time and interest) to never even consider
> replying to your mails.
> Anyway (see below), somebody already gave you a correct answer in
> the last thread you started. If the problem still persisted
> after that, you could/should have stated so.
>
> Show maturity in your mails and people will answer maturely.
>
>
> >From your IPFW-configuration:
>
> > $fwcmd add allow log tcp from any to any 21 setup
> > $fwcmd add allow log tcp from any 20 to any setup # really needed ?????
>
> The last rule above won't get you any closer to anonymous FTP on
> your machine. What you'd need, is something like:
>
> $fwcmd add allow log tcp from any to $MYIP 20
> $fwcmd add allow log tcp from $MYIP 20 to any
>
> where the first one lets "passive" FTP-packets pass and the second
> one "active" FTP-packets.
> As Manfredi Blasucci already replied to your last mail, the
> "setup" keyword was the problem.
>
> In fact, I guess you might even be able to limit the remote
> port-ranges to a few thousand ports somewhere in the range of
> port 44000 (that should be mentioned in the ftpd manpage).
>
>
> bye,
> Harold
>
> --
> Someone should do a study to find out how many human life spans have
> been lost waiting for NT to reboot.
> Ken Deboy on Dec 24 1999 in comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.96.1000707235611.7518K-100000>