Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:54:52 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Botero-Lowry <alex@foxybanana.com> Cc: Alexander Botero-Lowry <alexbl@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, alex@Laptop.mine.box, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/libsidplay2/files patch-libsidutils_include_sidplay_utils_SidUsage.h Message-ID: <20061001135452.4f26fba1@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200610010846.k918kNS9067262@Laptop.mine.box> References: <200610010256.k912u4WI047056@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061001114250.55647b74@localhost> <200610010846.k918kNS9067262@Laptop.mine.box>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 01:46:23 -0700 Alexander Botero-Lowry <alex@foxybanana.com> mentioned: > Sure, but libsidplay2 is also GPL'd, so the patch would be infected anyway. > I see, but , IMO, FreeBSD ports are beleived to be BSD-licensed including patches. Of course, maybe I've missed something. Correct me if it's wrong. That's a question which bothers me for a long time. -- Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> [[Россия, Москва]] PGP id: 0xEB269581 http://people.freebsd.org/~stas/stas.key.asc [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFH5BtK/VZk+smlYERAr2jAJ0dZQ24Ty1WiPeTDIK6VZrmo48avQCfYvGd n2/6UzaM1o0b393kktwpApM= =IZzG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061001135452.4f26fba1>