Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:49:52 +0200
From:      Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
To:        Michael Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: __P macro question 
Message-ID:  <63978.1012387792@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2002 02:34:21 PST." <200201301034.g0UAYLb01598@mass.dis.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 02:34:21 PST, Michael Smith wrote:

> Actually, eliminating __P() will have little or no effect on merge 
> activity.  It's a headerfile construct, typically only found in function 
> prototype blocks.  The sort of noise that would be generated by removing 
> it is fairly trivially identified and ignored, compared to any of the 
> other, massively intrusive changes that are going on.

So then it's just a case of unnecessary deltas for -STABLE cvsup users.
Or is there an argument against that as well?

Ciao,
Sheldon.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?63978.1012387792>