Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:17:50 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ermal_Lu=C3=A7i?= <eri@freebsd.org> To: J David <j.david.lists@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Ilya Bakulin <ilya@bakulin.de>, "freebsd-pf@freebsd.org" <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Checksumming outgoing packets in PF vs in ip[6]_output Message-ID: <CAPBZQG1%2BVWZDYqwFjufO-hM58kbK_WLnnso_Dgsf=1nDQ%2Bi2Ww@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CABXB=RRWNX6NnxCbebig-L41W4n9ZSBDrzOWa_k_TVHowhSbYg@mail.gmail.com> References: <d2f0c43909d9c9bada9a5bda7719cfca@mail.bakulin.de> <CABXB=RRWNX6NnxCbebig-L41W4n9ZSBDrzOWa_k_TVHowhSbYg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes confirmed it will solve that issue as well. On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:30 PM, J David <j.david.lists@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Ilya Bakulin <ilya@bakulin.de> wrote: > > Of course it was interesting what does the upstream PF do (@ OpenBSD). > Seems > > they have made the decision to > > leave the task of recalculating the checksums for outgoing packets to > > ip[6]_output, because currently > > the code there overwrites the checksum anyway. > > This seems a correct way to me. pf should not longer do any checksum > updates > > in inbound and outbound path. > > Is there any chance this change would help with bug 179392 as well? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179392 > > Or is that a separate issue? > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Ermal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPBZQG1%2BVWZDYqwFjufO-hM58kbK_WLnnso_Dgsf=1nDQ%2Bi2Ww>