Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:17:05 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" <bsder@allcaps.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Background fsck'ing Message-ID: <20020118141705.N13686@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20020118140829.C87193-100000@mail.allcaps.org>; from bsder@allcaps.org on Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:10:44PM -0800 References: <20020118140829.C87193-100000@mail.allcaps.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Andrew P. Lentvorski <bsder@allcaps.org> [020118 14:10] wrote: > My apologies for being an idiot and hitting ^X before I meant to ... > > I looked at the CVS repository today and didn't note a tag on the fsck > code for -STABLE. > > Is background fsck'ing included in -STABLE? The large fsck times for > multi-GB and TB RAID servers is becoming an impediment to using FreeBSD as > a server (where BSD has traditionally been strong). > > If it's not included, what are the issues preventing it from getting > folded backward? It requires extensive backporting for snapshot support. The current background fsck is experimental and can cause problems for people, it's still somewhat in development. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020118141705.N13686>